advertisement

SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

14 Comments
Columns

Liberal Doctors Claim Gun Ownership Is a Disease

June 14, 2018 - 2:45pm

On Wednesday, the American Medical Association passed a series of gun-related resolutions, including calling for a ban on “assault weapons” and came out against arming teachers to fight what it claims is a public health crisis.

The Associated Press reports Dr. Megan Ranney, an emergency-medicine specialist at Brown University, said at the meeting, “We as physicians are the witnesses to the human toll of this disease.”

What exactly is the “disease” that stirred Dr. Ranney’s emotional outburst? Apparently, it is gun ownership.

AMA delegates voted to adopt several of nearly a dozen gun-related proposals presented by doctor groups that are part of the AMA’s membership. AP reports they agreed to --

Support any bans on the purchase or possession of guns and ammunition by people under 21.

Back laws that would require licensing and safety courses for gun owners and registration of all firearms.

Press for legislation that would allow relatives of suicidal people or those who have threatened imminent violence to seek court-ordered removal of guns from the home.

Encourage better training for physicians in how to recognize patients at risk for suicide.

Push to eliminate loopholes in laws preventing the purchase or possession of guns by people found guilty of domestic violence, including expanding such measures to cover convicted stalkers.

The problem is that physicians, who generally pride themselves on being men and women of science are acting on pure emotion and Leftwing politics when it comes to guns.

As our friend Benny Johnson, writing for the Daily Caller documented in his Feb. 19 article, knives kill far more people in the United States than rifles do every year.

In 2016, the most recent year for which statistics are available, knives actually killed nearly five times as many people as rifles that year.

According to the FBI, 1,604 people were killed by “knives and cutting instruments” and 374 were killed by “rifles” in 2016.

Johnson reports the statistics match the trends seen in previous years, which show knife murders far outnumbering rifle statistics. In 2013, knives were used to kill 1,490 and rifles were used to kill 285. Handguns far outnumber both knives and rifles in American murders. There were 7,105 murders by handgun in America in 2016.

Back in 2016, when Massachusetts liberals wanted to expand the Bay State’s 30-year old ban on “assault rifles,” FOX News reported that the “FBI Uniform Crime Statistics show zero murders were committed in Massachusetts in 2014 using rifles of any sort. While most mass shootings in the U.S. involved a rifle, the vast majority of gun deaths nationwide did not.”

But being for an “assault rifle” ban really makes it look like you are for treating the “disease” of gun ownership.

As the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action once noted, for the last quarter-century, the “assault weapon” panic has been fomented by gun prohibitionists who know that because some “assault weapons” have a military appearance, people can be tricked into believing they are machine guns.

Since then, the gun-prohibition lobbies have attempted to ban as many guns as possible by using the deliberately vague and emotional label “assault weapon.”

In 1993, they convinced the Connecticut legislature to enact such as ban. Notably, none of the guns used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School murders were considered “assault weapons” under Connecticut law.

Yet former President Obama, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and California’s Sen. Dianne Feinstein immediately insisted that the Sandy Hook murders proved the need for a national “assault weapons” ban.

What’s more, the national statistics on murder do not bear out the AMA’s overwrought claim that there is a “public health crisis” of murder by firearm.

In a February 12, 2018 article published just two days before the Parkland High School killings, Bloomberg opinion columnist Justin Fox pointed out that the murder rate in 2014 was lower than at any time since the FBI started keeping track in 1960.

Fox later quoted from "Uneasy Peace: The Great Crime Decline, The Renewal of City Life, and the Next War on Violence," by New York University sociologist Patrick Sharkey which takes things a few steps further:

Because of shoddy data prior to 1960, it is impossible to know with certainty the exact rate of crime and violence in the first five decades of the 20th century or at any earlier point in the history of the country. But the most persuasive research from historical mortality records concludes that the homicide rate was likely substantially higher in the first half of the 20th century than it was in the second half. 

In fact, the prevalence of murder has been falling, albeit with spikes and troughs, throughout the country's history. If the historical trends in murder derived from mortality records are roughly accurate, and all indications suggest that they are, then we are led to a startling conclusion: 2014 was not only the safest year of the past five decades, it was one of the safest years in U.S. history.

To repeat, said Justin Fox: Violent crime was possibly near or at an all-time low in the U.S. in 2014, and while it's up a bit since then, it is still quite low by historical standards.

The American Medical Association’s call for an “assault weapons” ban and other gun control measures is a cure in search of a disease, and like so many other cures for society’s ills that are based on emotion and leftwing politics, rather than science and hard-fact analysis, it should be rejected.

The toll-free Capitol Switchboard is 1-866-220-0044. We urge readers and friends to call their U.S. representatives and senators today to demand that they reject the American Medical Association’s calls for further encroachments on the Second Amendment.

George Rasley is the editor of ConservativeHQ.com, the online news source for conservatives and tea partiers committed to bringing limited-government, constitutional conservatives to power.

 


READ MORE FROM SUNSHINE STATE NEWS

Putnam Says Public Safety 'Not at Risk' in License Snafu

Second Amendment Foes Spinning Story of Concealed-Carry Application Failure

Comments

The overwhelming majority of the doctors I know are gun owners and staunch supporters of the Second Amendment. The liberal, anti-gun leadership of the AMA is out of step with doctors as well as America.

Gun Owners should file a class action suit against the aggregate of these doctors for malpractice. A suit of such kind would be a great show of force for the gun owners. (which side would Morgan & Morgan want to be on?)

Johns Hopkins patient safety experts have calculated that more than 250,000 deaths per year are due to medical error in the U.S. ... Maybe its Dr. Ranney who is the real danger here?

So Claude Kirk, in order to avoid that "liberal doctor" disease will gun owners rely on their firearms to cure themselves when they develop a health problem such as cancer or heart disease? Nineteen children are injured and three to four die every day in the U.S. by gunshots. Some doctors consider that a public health hazard and think they should be able to ask if the child's household has guns and instruct the parents as to proper safeguarding of the weapon from the child. Doctors know that prevention of health issues is important but there are some who would tell the doctor "forget about prevention and just treat the kid's gunshot wounds."

So, Bob H. Over 2000 children a year are killed by their own parents. Should doctors go house to house and make sure kids aren't abused? How about accidents? Car crashes kill 260,000 children a year. Perhaps doctors should go out to the parking lot and inspect your car. Or maybe, just maybe, they should do their jobs, stop over-medicating kids (how many of these spree shooters lately were on prescription meds that docs get perks for prescribing?) and get over their God complex. Narcissism is a disease, maybe some of these guys (and you and your high-horse) should get some help. P.S. Your stats are B.S., and only work if you use Obama and co.'s formula of including 26 year olds as "children".

A perfectly worded comment.

Education is the key. We must educate our youth and their parents about GUNS as being a tool. Any tool can be devastating or very useful. I and my friend were taught about guns as youth......To my knowledge none of those people killed anyone or themselves. My son was taught about guns as a youth and he has been an advocate of knowing how to handle guns, but more importantly, they are not toys. I have met many youth, through helping my son and his youth groups. Many of those kids are as aware and knowledgeable about guns as more adults in congress today. The problem is that there are many people out in the world that have NEVER been educated about guns. Rather they have been taught to believe that guns are the root of all the world's ills. I suggest that the doctors need to be educated and that we all learn a bit more about guns. Oh yes, I understand the need for gun safety more than most. My dad when he was 25 years old and I was 1, had a hunting accident that cost him an eye. Didn't stop him from having a life ... a decent life. That gun which was involved, is at my home it shows evidence of the accident. I cleaned it regularly to remind myself, my family, and anyone that might be nearby that gun safety is important. It is the lack of knowledge that maims and kills.

What a flimsy shallow ploy to divert attention away from the embarrassing root cause of this violence problem, the health care profession itself. the overwhelming cause of gun deaths is not due to those who lawfully purchased them but rather ner'-do-wells and convicted felons who are not supposed to have them anyway. But gun ownership is not a disease. Folks who are unable to cope, have emotional instability, need medication to control impulse's and their ilk are the ones everyone avoids seeing their red flags until it is too late. Many of these mass shootings stem from folks with emotional issues. That's where the focus should be. Identifying unstable individuals and putting them on a list to prevent gun purchases or if they have registered guns, confiscate them. And those health professionals who do not expose these dangers should be both civilly and criminally responsible when a patient goes ballistic and inflicts carnage on the innocent. Then maybe we can be pre-emptive rather than reactive to save lives.

Listen up. People are people. Emotions and personal psychology are personal. We know. Guns can be one shot, several shots, semi auto, auto. The mechanical damage (and the "ego"/"mental state") of the person wielding the firearm) have much to do with the threat to civil society posed by folks energised by George Rasley's article. Ask any bartender - or police officer.

Everything made sense up to "The mechanical damage (and the "ego"/"mental state") of the person wielding the firearm) have much to do with the threat to civil society posed by folks energised by George Rasley's article.", and I got more lost by your further comment "Ask any bartender - or police officer" ? Ask them what question? Are you one of those energized people? In reading the article I get the understanding that Mr. Rasley is a supporter of the 2nd amendment and is asking the reader to call their representative and ask them to not curtail their 2nd amendment rights.

The mechanical advantage given by easy accessibility to modern firearms is the problem. I am energized. Guns and civil society are at swords points. Bartenders and police officers - among many others that work with the public - know the threats associated with intoxication, drugs, emotional turmoil, and or a plain bad day involving people and guns.

The mechanical advantage given by easy accessibility to modern firearms is the problem. I am energized. Guns and civil society are at swords points. Bartenders and police officers - among many others that work with the public - know the threats associated with intoxication, drugs, emotional turmoil, and or a plain bad day involving people and guns.

compounded by "medical marijuana"

Gun Owners Claim Liberal Doctors Are A Disease

Comments are now closed.

columns
advertisement

Opinion Poll

Who did the better job choosing a lieutenant governor?
Older pollsResults
advertisement

Chatterbox

Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement