SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed


Proposed Tourist Tax Changes Draw Debate

January 10, 2018 - 7:45pm
Despite objections from parts of the tourism industry, House members Wednesday began moving forward with a bill that would allow local tourist-development taxes to be used for projects such as adding roads or expanding sewer and water systems.
The bill (HB 585), which was approved in a 9-4 vote by the House Tourism & Gaming Control Subcommittee, would expand the ways so-called “bed” tax money can be spent to include infrastructure projects. Those projects would have to be linked to increasing “tourist-related business activities.”
Sponsor Randy Fine, R-Palm Bay, said tourist-development tax money can already be used for such things as convention centers, stadiums and beach-restoration projects. He said the bill, for example, would allow the money to be used for pedestrian overpasses in tourist areas.
Fine and other supporters said the bill would allow local officials to decide whether to spend the tax money on infrastructure projects.
“Today, we say if you want to (use the money to) build an overpass that your tourists will use, you can’t,” Fine said. “If you want to build a boardwalk along the beach that your tourists will use, you can’t. If you want to build a bike path, you can’t.”
But the bill drew opposition from the Florida Restaurant & Lodging Association and the Central Florida Hotel & Lodging Association. At least in part, critics said they are concerned local governments will use tourist-development money to pay for infrastructure projects that should be funded in other ways --- and, as a result, will divert money from tourism promotion and advertising.
“When it comes to infrastructure projects or environmental projects, these are very costly projects, and this is not what the tourist-development tax statute was designed for,” said Richard Turner, a lobbyist for the Florida Restaurant & Lodging Association.
If the money is allowed to be used for additional infrastructure projects, Turner suggested placing restrictions on it. For example, he suggested placing a percentage limit on how much of projects could be funded with tourist-development money. Also, he suggested requiring “supermajority” votes by county commissions on such uses of the money.
But Fine and others described the bill as giving more control to local officials.
“The projects have to be directly related to tourism,” Fine said. “But what we’re saying is, tourism is more than advertising on TV.”
A Senate version of the bill (SB 658), filed by Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, has been approved by one committee and is pending in the Finance and Tax Appropriations Subcommittee. Fine’s bill will go to the House Ways and Means Committee.


I'm encouraged when I see any interest in roads, etc. in relation to increased development to house more and more people and....VEHICLES. So much rhetoric centers around the advantages of bringing more tourists to Florida without talk around how to accommodate them on our existing roadways. Trollies, cable cars, buses are not a solution to the single mom trying to transport her three kids, toys, and beach equipment while boarding and unboarding a public transit vehicle to get from hotel to beach. Insane "solution". Doesn't work in real life. How about the developer, hotel builder footing the bill to to provide the necessary roads, overpasses, parking to accommodate the increase in tourist population?? It isn't fair to the local population to be forced to stay indoors during tourist season because we can't get out on the jammed roadways. I'm not sure what bed-tax money is used for now. Is anyone accountable for how that money is used and whether it benefits the local population or just the pockets of the local leaders who have the power to ok or nix a project? Waste, fraud and abuse in the tourist industry needs to be aired before more tax dollars are forked over to local politicians. Just my opinion...

Lobbys, Lobbys, Lobbys, ALL "SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS" catering to the "squeaky wheels" and "majority activists" among us (and include "entrepreneurial politicians" in THAT "group") ; ALL of the "aforementioned" spend 24 hours a day imagining, and thinking about, "creative ways" to spend your TAX dollars,... and THEN telling YOU "It's a DONE DEAL, move along,.. nothing to see here... ("But we do need a few increases in "creative TAXES" ...)." WAKE UP FOLKS,...They're "creating" another California, or New York, or Illinois (all those places that people "escape from"...

We don't need more money for government, we need less government for the people. You can get all you need by eliminating what you don't need.

Comments are now closed.


Opinion Poll

Should Florida Secretary of State Mike Ertel have resigned?
Older pollsResults


Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.