SSN on Facebook
SSN on Twitter
SSN on YouTube
RSS Feed


When Protectionism Is Rampant, No Bad Deed Goes Unrewarded

January 29, 2018 - 7:00am

Like Horatius at the bridge, or the boy who stood on the burning deck whence all but he had fled, or the Dutch boy who saved the city by putting his finger in the dike -- pick your analogous heroism -- the Trump administration last week acted to stanch the flood of foreign-made washing machines that are being imported because Americans want them.

The stanching will be accomplished by quotas and stiff (up to 50 percent) tariffs, which are taxes collected at the border and paid by American consumers. Americans also will pay higher prices for washing machines made domestically by Whirlpool, which sought this protectionism, from which it instantly profited: In Monday's after-hours trading, Whirlpool's stock rose 3 percent. When protectionism is rampant, no bad deed goes unrewarded.

The washing machine drama about "putting (a faction of) America first" cannot be industrial policy -- government rather than the market picking winners and losers. And it cannot be government redistribution of wealth. And it cannot be crony capitalism. It cannot be those things because Republicans oppose those things and control policymaking.

Next, and soon, will come a government decision about the problem, as our protectors see it, of menacingly inexpensive steel imports, concerning which the administration is pretending to deliberate. The charade of thinking will end with the imposition of yet more steel tariffs/taxes, joining the 149 (some as high as 266 percent) targeting many of the over 110 countries and territories from which America imports steel. Twenty-four of the existing duties target Chinese steel, which is just less than 3 percent of U.S. steel imports. America's supposedly embattled steel industry is producing more than it did during World War II, and every year in this decade more than 10 percent of American-made steel goods has been exported.

Imposition of the new tariffs/taxes will be done solely by the president, exercising discretion granted to presidents by various laws, including one passed in December 1974, when Congress evidently thought that Watergate, then fresh in memory, had taught that presidents were not sufficiently imperial. Then, as now, Congress seemed to think it had more important things to do than set trade policy.

In his new book "Clashing Over Commerce," Dartmouth economist Douglas A. Irwin explains that the steel industry was a powerful advocate of protectionism until the 1892 opening of Minnesota's Mesabi iron ore range, which gave steel producers cost advantages that turned their attention to export markets. The industry's trade problems began when, in July 1959, the United Steelworkers shut domestic steel production down for 116 days -- the longest industrial strike in U.S. history -- and steel-consuming industries found alternative suppliers and materials. Desperate management purchased labor peace with increased wages that by the 1980s were 95 percent higher than the average in manufacturing, and soon U.S. steel was priced out of foreign markets. Intermittently since then, the industry has sought and received protection.

In 2002, George W. Bush imposed tariffs that caused steel prices to surge, costing more jobs in steel-using industries than then existed in steel-making. (Today there are upward of 7 times more steel-using than steel-making jobs.) The tariffs cost $400,000 a year for every steel-making job saved, and cost $4 billion in lost wages. Especially hard hit in 2002 were three states -- Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania -- that in 2016 voted for today's protectionist president.

Last June, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who became a billionaire by plunging into the steel industry simultaneously with Bush offering it succor, said that "since we are the world's largest importer of steel, we're the main victim of the overcapacity" in the global steel industry. This puzzled George Mason University's Don Boudreaux, who wondered "just how our being the world's largest buyer of steel makes us victims of the alleged overcapacity."

Fomenting spurious anxieties about national security is the first refuge of rent-seeking scoundrels who tart up their protectionism as patriotism when they inveigle government into lining their pockets with money extracted from their fellow citizens. Sugar producers are ludicrously protected in the name of "food security." Most of U.S. steel imports come from four important allies: Canada, South Korea, Mexico, Brazil. The coming steel tariffs/taxes will mean that defense dollars will buy fewer ships, tanks and armored vehicles, just as the trillion infrastructure dollars the administration talks about will buy fewer bridges and other steel-using projects. As Henry George said, with protectionism a nation does to itself in peacetime what an enemy tries to do to it in war.

George Will's email address is

(c) 2018, Washington Post Writers Group


Remember when "U.S. Steel" shut down in the '70's and we began sending our old "scrap steel" to the Far East to be "processed", and it came back to America in the form of "Foreign cars" that "rusted out" while you watched...?!? NOW, we get appliances, and 'small' appliances, that have a "life expectancy" of five years (or less) that CAN'T be fixed,...ONLY REPLACED ! ! ! (Ahhh, "progress")... {Well, Mister Trump has been watching;...... and has miraculously become "President Trump"} (Praise be to God ! )

There you go AGAIN George,..."Off on your left foot"; like you alone have some "inside information" upon which to prognosticate to the "plebs" and "unwashed"..... (Like "Trapper" intuits, "a smooth, flat, round, River rock", along side the river, upon which to beat your clothes "will do the job" quite well (in cold water too..). Another costly problem solved;.... NEXT !...

I suspect it has been some time since George bought a washing machine. Or did a load of laundry. I bought a new, on sale "Maytag Centennial " washer from Lowes. $500. Lasted 90 days. The "motherboard" fails to communicate with.....whatever the hell it is supposed to communicate with Does not wash clothes. Turns out Maytag is no longer Maytag but a subsidiary of Chinese gig. Bout impossible to fix and you can go broke trying. Look on the web and see the dozens of videos trying to explain the beast. Friend gave me a 25 year old Maytag that had been sitting in a barn for 10 years. Plugged it in and it washed clothes, which is all I wanted. Oh, I think our Fearless Leader on the right path. Do yourself a favor and don't buy a Maytag Centennial washer. A couple good rocks from the river a better way to go.

Add new comment


Opinion Poll

Will the 17 gun deaths at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School have any effect on bills in the Florida Legislature this session?
Older pollsResults


Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.